The decision by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to approve a $2.34 billion (Sh250 billion) loan package to support Kenya’s pandemic response and economic reform programme, reduce debt vulnerabilities, address weaknesses in State-owned enterprises and strengthen the anti-corruption framework, has sparked bitter reactions from Kenyans.
The frustration among the citizenry is that the lender is issuing this loan in the face of several accountability concerns in regard to the management of previous loans and donations.
Further, the loan could lead to an increase in consumption taxes, which has a cross sector impact on a populace that is already overburdened by taxes yet underserved, and heavily indebted to the tune of Sh7.35 trillion as at the end of January.
In regard to accountability, fears abound that the bailout deal could reignite another cycle of unbridled, impudent and senseless looting of public funds as witnessed during the first phase of the Covid-19 pandemic response.
Kenyans are still reeling from the shocking accounts of how some procurement contracts were issued irregularly, with inflated costs to a cabal of rogue suppliers, with some supplying substandard Personal Protective Equipment (PPEs), completely disregarding the plight and welfare of frontline health workers.
Worse still, no one has been brought to book for theft of resources that were intended to protect Kenyans in their greatest hour of need.
This is indeed a stark national reminder that all individuals found culpable of plundering public Covid-19 funds should be prosecuted, and companies implicated in the scandal blacklisted.
The IMF’s current loan package to Kenya, comes almost a year after the same lender had approved the disbursement of $739 million (Sh80 billion) to be drawn under the Rapid Credit Facility to support the authorities’ response to the Covid-19 pandemic.
IMF, in its statement then said that the authorities plan to conduct independent post-crisis auditing of Covid-19 related expenditure to ensure that Covid-19 related resources are used for their intended purpose.
It is not clear if this audit was ever conducted, and if it was done, it was not made public.
So, while the global lender might be acting in good faith, skepticism is rife among Kenyans that the IMF goodies will only finance the next phase of corruption and Covid-19 millionaires, and leave the taxpayers bearing the burden of the rapidly spiraling public debt.
The government should publicly make available all reports of independent audits of Covid-19 related expenditure supported by borrowed funds.
Citizen demand on public debt accountability should continue relentlessly until the government fully embraces public debt transparency which is critical information on addressing weaknesses in state-owned enterprises.
Without this level of openness and accountability in the borrowing and management of public debt, including prudent and responsible use of these funds, Kenyans’ fears that additional debts will plunge the country deeper into the debt crisis and increase their debt burden are valid.
One sure route towards increasing domestic resources is bolstering anti-corruption efforts.
Insulating borrowed funds from theft through active involvement of oversight agencies in the entire debt cycle to monitor the use of funds, giving citizens information on fund use and access to supported interventions to perform citizen audits to verify that funds were indeed put to good use are among proactive measures that should be undertaken.
Investing in asset recovery efforts is also key, Kenya desperately needs stolen resources recovered and repatriated into its ailing economy, particularly at this time when the country is swaddled in runaway public debt. – The writer is Executive Director, Transparency International Kenya